Obama vs. Romney: 'World War III" for attack ads. But is that bad?

With five months to go until Election Day, the Romney and Obama campaigns are already slinging negative ads. But analysts suggest they're an essential part of voters' decision-making process.

By Mike Eckel,?Contributor / May 24, 2012

President Barack Obama speaks in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington earlier this month. He opened a new advertising assault on challenger Mitt Romney's record as a businessman, casting the likely Republican nominee as a greedy entrepreneur who bought up companies and wiped out jobs.

Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP

Enlarge

And you thought it was bad already.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "off"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

There are still five months to go before Election Day, and the campaigns of Mitt Romney and Barack Obama are just beginning to lock horns for real, but negative attack ads are already exploding over the airwaves and the Internet.

Take Mr. Obama?s recent attack on Mr. Romney?s work at private equity firm Bain Capital?or Romney?s recent broadside against Obama?s economic policies. Both candidates have record-breaking war chests already and continue raising funds at a dizzying pace in anticipation of what may end up being a scorched earth campaign.

?We?re now entering the World War III of attack ads. We are dropping atomic and hydrogen bombs,? says Charles Dunn, a political scientist at Regent University in Virginia Beach, Va. ?We were just firing shotguns before.?

Add to all this the growing deluge of advertising resulting from the 2010 US Supreme Court decision Citizens United, which opened the fire hose for private money pouring into so-called "super PACs." So long as the super PACs do not coordinate directly with the campaign, there is no limit on how much super PACs can spend on ads supporting or denigrating one candidate or another, as witnessed in the messy Republican presidential primary race.

Those hoping this year for a kinder, nobler national debate to choose the next occupant of the White House likely will be sorely disappointed.

But veteran political watchers and analysts readily point out that negative political advertising may?actually be essential to the process of deciding whom to vote for.

?There?s no need to wring your hands about the attacks ads, we?ve always had them, since the beginning of the republic. We have just to acknowledge them and the role they play,? Mr. Dunn says. ?They bring things out about an opponent?s record in ways that a positive ad might not. It is what it is. Let?s not worry about it. Let?s just go on.?

miss america 2012 hgtv dream home patriots vs broncos contraband denver vs new england denver broncos vs new england patriots cruise ship sinking