Friday, December 2, 2011

Broker for would-be Times Square bomber sentenced (AP)

NEW YORK ? The money broker charged with unwittingly providing $7,000 to Times Square bomb plotter Faisal Shahzad (FY'-sul shah-ZAHD') has been sentenced to three years' probation.

Mohammad Younis of Centereach, on New York's Long Island, was sentenced Thursday.

He pleaded guilty in August to an illegal banking charge. Prosecutors had accused him of using an illegal money transfer system to funnel the money to Shahzad in 2010.

Shazad admitted using the money to finance his failed car bomb attack in Times Square. He's serving a life sentence.

The government conceded that Younis didn't know what Shazad was up to, and his lawyers argued that putting him behind bars was unnecessary. But prosecutors said a sentence of up to six months was appropriate to deter money transmissions that could fund terrorism.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/us/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111201/ap_on_re_us/us_times_square_car_bomb

alex smith christine christine redskins oyster festival oyster festival hopkins

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Watchdog complains of pressure on Russian voters (AP)

MOSCOW ? Some Russian voters are complaining of pressure from authorities to provide more votes for the ruling pro-Kremlin party in the upcoming parliamentary elections, an independent Russian election watchdog group said Wednesday.

Alexander Kynev, chief of research for the Golos group, said that compared to the previous election four years ago there appears to be less pressure on candidates than on voters.

Golos set up a website to collect and display complaints of election law violations throughout Russia. It currently counts more than 4,000 complaints.

About a third come from voters who say they're being pressured ? mostly by bosses at work or professors at universities ? to vote for the ruling United Russia party.

The party is supported by President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin but its ratings have been dwindling.

Kynev said that even those who do not necessarily support the opposition parties seem to be complaining about the pressure.

United Russia won 64 percent of the vote in the 2007 Duma election, but the latest polls show the party hovering at about 50 percent.

Along with Medvedev and Putin, scores of government ministers, mayors and governors take part in United Russian campaigning events in their constituencies.

Under Russian law, state official must take a vacation if they want to campaign. Observers say politicians combine their everyday work and campaigning, thus abusing their dominant position in a particular region or industry.

Liliya Shibanova, Golos' executive director, said that an active role that senior government officials take in United Russia campaigning "contributes to the inequality of election participants which predetermines the outcome of the vote."

__

Online:

Golos' Map of Violations (in Russian): http://www.kartanarusheniy.ru/

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/russia/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111130/ap_on_re_eu/eu_russia_election

renaissance festival melanie iglesias catherine tate theo epstein theo epstein darknet james ray

RIM to offer security features for iPhone, Android (Reuters)

TORONTO (Reuters) ? Research In Motion is introducing a software tool that gives corporate customers the option of linking employees' personal iPhones to the BlackBerry network without compromising security.

The move, announced on Tuesday, is RIM's first tangible acknowledgment that it has lost its iron grip on the corporate smartphone market and must accommodate the growing preference of workers for Apple and Google's Android devices. Its battered shares jumped on the announcement.

"It's not an admission of guilt - it's a necessary evil," Suquehanna analyst Jeff Fidacaro said.

RIM's Mobile Fusion service is designed to give the Canadian company the leading role in managing corporate communications, whether over the BlackBerry or a rival device.

"What our enterprise customers are looking for, and the opportunity for us, is to become the de facto platform," Alan Panezic, RIM's vice-president for enterprise product management, said in an interview ahead of the announcement.

Taking a first, tentative step to offer its network services independently of its own devices, the company could develop a fresh source of revenue to offset a shrinking market share in handsets.

Indeed, success with the strategy could encourage RIM to focus more and more on services rather than devices.

RIM's often-volatile stock closed 5.4 percent higher at $17.37 on Nasdaq and up 5.5 percent at C$17.95 in Toronto. It still down more than 70 percent this year following a string of delayed or botched product launches, and disappointing quarterly results.

RIM's BlackBerry was for years the preferred device for businesses and government agencies, who treasured its encrypted data and distributed the device to millions of workers needing secure, round-the-clock email access.

But many workers now prefer using their own Apple and Android-powered devices to access corporate emails, raising security questions for corporations, which RIM hopes to address with the new software.

"While a positive step, the larger challenges remain RIM's need to narrow competitive gaps in its handsets," RBC Capital Markets analyst Mike Abramsky wrote in a note to clients. He pointed to RIM's software deficiencies and limited content and applications available on its devices.

RIM's slice of the lucrative U.S. smartphone market fell to 9 percent in the third quarter, down from 24 percent a year earlier, according to research firm Canalys. Globally, the report placed RIM in fifth place, with 10 percent market share, compared with 15 percent a year earlier.

DUE BY LATE MARCH

Mobile Fusion, due in late March, will allow corporate information technology staff to set and monitor rules for passwords, apps and software on a range of devices, including Apple's iPad and iPhone, and smartphones using the Android operating system.

A company can remotely lock or wipe a lost or stolen device, a key selling point for security-conscious corporations that may have been wary of shifting away from the BlackBerry.

"We will take full advantage of whatever security capabilities are provided by the core operating system. We're not going to hold that back in any way, shape or form," Panezic said.

Mobile Fusion will include and extend existing BlackBerry Enterprise Servers, or BES, behind corporate firewalls.

Panezic said the software will manage RIM's PlayBook independently from a BlackBerry after the tablet - which has yet to gain traction with either businesses or consumers - receives a long-awaited software upgrade, due in February.

He declined to give any pricing details for the Fusion service, but said it would be competitive with rivals.

"It will help stem the tide of those companies that may have considered eliminating their BES but it won't help sell more phones," said Gartner analyst Phillip Redman. "That's what they really need to do."

"RATTLE SOME CAGES"

RIM has recently launched touchscreen devices using its legacy BlackBerry operating system as it works to put the QNX software powering the PlayBook on to a new generation of phones from early next year.

The new software follows on from the acquisition of device management company Ubitexx, which RIM announced in May.

Smaller companies such as Good Technology, MobileIron and BoxTone already offer device management as companies fret about leakage of sensitive commercial information via their workers' personal, non-BlackBerry devices.

"This will definitely rattle some cages" among firms that filled a niche by securing and managing iPhones and other non-BlackBerry devices for corporations, Forrester analyst Christian Kane said.

Panezic said customers had requested a solution to handle Apple and Android devices, but RIM would consider adding support for other systems, such as Microsoft's Windows Phone, if it saw enough demand.

($1=$1.03 Canadian)

(Reporting by Alastair Sharp; editing by Frank McGurty)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/applecomputer/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20111129/tc_nm/us_rim

will power will power indy 500 martin luther king memorial walking dead season 2 walking dead season 2 saving private ryan

Top Gear presenter in hot water over "silly" remarks (Reuters)

LONDON (Reuters) ? British Prime Minister David Cameron has criticized comments made by "Top Gear" television show presenter Jeremy Clarkson after he said the country's striking public sector workers should be "shot in front of their families."

Clarkson, whose mocking personality helped make the Top Gear automobile show a popular broadcast around the world, was speaking on Wednesday as state workers like nurses, teachers and civil servants were staging a 24-hour strike against government plans to make them pay more and work longer for their pensions.

"I'd have them all shot," the 51-year-old said on the BBC's prime-time One Show.

"I would take them outside and execute them in front of their families," he added. "I mean how dare they go on strike when they have got these gilt-edged pensions that are going to be guaranteed while the rest of us have to work for a living?"

After a media furor, Clarkson apologized on Thursday for his comments, while a BBC spokesman noted the One Show had apologized at the end of the show to viewers who may have been offended.

"I didn't for a moment intend these remarks to be taken seriously -- as I believe is clear if they're seen in context. If the BBC and I have caused any offence, I'm quite happy to apologies for it alongside them," Clarkson said in comments carried by BBC news.

Cameron who is a friend of the presenter, said on the ITV's Good Morning program the comments were a "silly thing to say."

"I'm sure he didn't mean it," he added.

Unison, the public service trade union, initially said it would consider taking legal action against the presenter over his "appalling" comments, but later welcomed Clarkson's apology and dropped plans for litigation and calls for his resignation.

"We are pleased Jeremy Clarkson has seen the error of his ways. It is only right the he apologizes for the huge offence he caused to public sector workers and their families," said Dave Prentis, UNISON General Secretary, in a statement.

"We would like to invite him to spend a day on a hospital ward, with one of our healthcare assistants. They do vital work caring for patients - cleaning up sick, bathing patients, and wiping bottoms. We think he has many of the personal skills necessary for the job," he added.

Unions estimated more than 2 million public sector workers in the UK went on strike over changes to their pensions on Wednesday, though polls showed not all Britons supported them.

Critics of the strike say state pensions compare very favorably with those in the private sector and that public workers should share the pain of belt-tightening measures.

Columnist James Delingpole wrote in right-leaning British newspaper the Telegraph that Clarkson's critics should be "taken out and shot" for castigating the broadcaster over the employment of an acceptable and commonly used figure of speech.

"For at least the last fifty years 'they should be taken out and shot,' has been a socially acceptable, perfectly unexceptionable way of expressing colorfully and vehemently one's distaste towards a particular category of unpleasantness, be it striking Unison workers, revolting students, poorly performing members of your football team or the Lib Dem members of Cameron's cabinet. Context is all," Delingpole wrote.

Clarkson is known for his outspokenness. He aroused public anger over comments about former Prime Minister Gordon Brown's partial blindness and over an article in which he said the Welsh language should be abolished.

In February, he was at the centre of a diplomatic row after making offensive remarks about Mexico, suggesting the country didn't have an Olympic team, "because anyone who can run jump or swim is already across the (U.S.) border."

(Editing by Steve Addison and Paul Casciato)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/celebrity/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20111201/people_nm/us_britain_strikes_clarkson

cloudy with a chance of meatballs houston nutt houston nutt peter marshall peter marshall zombie boy zombie boy

Restoring the basic bargain between the rich and the rest

The deal at the heart of the American economy is that employers pay their workers enough to buy what employers are selling. When we forget that?as we have over the last decade?the trouble starts.

For most of the last century, the basic bargain at the heart of the American economy was that employers paid their workers enough to buy what American employers were selling.

Skip to next paragraph Robert Reich

Robert is chancellor's professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Clinton. He has written 13 books, including 'The Work of Nations,' 'Locked in the Cabinet,' and his most recent book, 'Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future.' His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

Recent posts

That basic bargain created a virtuous cycle of higher living standards, more jobs, and better wages.

Back in 1914, Henry Ford announced he was paying workers on his Model T assembly line $5 a day ? three times what the typical factory employee earned at the time. The Wall Street Journal termed his action ?an economic crime.?

But Ford knew it was a cunning business move. The higher wage turned Ford?s auto workers into customers who could afford to buy Model T?s. In two years Ford?s profits more than doubled.

That was then. Now, Ford Motor Company is paying its new hires half what it paid new employees a few years ago.

The basic bargain is over ? not only at Ford but all over the American economy.

New data from the Commerce Department shows employee pay is now down to the smallest share of the economy since the government began collecting wage and salary data in 1929.

Meanwhile, corporate profits now constitute the largest share of the economy since 1929.

1929, by the way, was the year of the Great Crash that ushered in the Great Depression.

In the years leading up to the Great Crash, most employers forgot Henry Ford?s example. The wages of most American workers remained stagnant. The gains of economic growth went mainly into corporate profits and into the pockets of the very rich. American families maintained their standard of living by going deeper into debt. In 1929 the debt bubble popped.

Sound familiar? It should. The same thing happened in the years leading up to the crash of 2008.

The latest data on corporate profits and wages show we haven?t learned?the essential lesson of the two big economic crashes of the last seventy-five years: When the economy becomes too lopsided ? disproportionately benefitting corporate owners and top executives rather than average workers ? it tips over.

In other words, we?re in trouble because the basic bargain has been broken.

Yet incredibly, some politicians think the best way to restart the nation?s job engine is to make corporations even more profitable and the rich even richer ? reducing corporate taxes; cutting back on regulations protecting public health, worker safety, the environment, and small investors; and slashing taxes on the very rich.

These same politicians think average workers should have even less money in their pockets. They don?t want to extend the payroll tax cut or unemployment benefits. And they want to make it harder for workers to form unions.

These politicians have reality upside down.

Corporations don?t need more money. They have so much money right now they don?t even know what to do with all of it. They?re even buying back their own shares of stock. This is a bonanza for CEOs whose pay is tied to stock prices and it increases the wealth of other shareholders. But it doesn?t create a single new job and it doesn?t raise the wages of a single employee.

Nor do the wealthiest Americans need more money. The top 1 percent is already taking in more than 20 percent of total income ? the highest since the 1920s.

American businesses, including small-business owners, have no incentive to create new jobs because consumers (whose spending accounts for about 70 percent of the American economy) aren?t spending enough. Consumers? after-tax incomes dropped in the second and third quarters of the year, the first back-to-back drops since 2009.

The recent small pickup in consumer spending has come out of their savings. Obviously this can?t continue, and corporations know it. Consumer savings are already at their lowest level in four years.

Get it? Corporate profits are up right now largely because pay is down and companies aren?t hiring. But this is a losing game even for corporations over the long term. Without enough American consumers, their profitable days are numbered.

After all, there?s a limit to how much profit they can get out of cutting American payrolls or even selling abroad. European consumers are in no mood to buy. And most Asian economies, including China, are slowing.

We?re in a vicious cycle. The only way out of it is to put more money into the pockets of average Americans. That means extending the payroll tax cut. And extending unemployment benefits.

Don?t stop there. Create a WPA to get the long-term unemployed back to work. And a Civilian Conservation Corp to create jobs for young people.

Hire teachers for classrooms now overcrowded, and pay them enough to attract people who are talented as well as dedicated. Rebuild our pot-holed highways. Create a world-class infrastructure.

Pay for this by hiking taxes on millionaires.

A basic bargain was once at the heart of the American economy. It recognized that average workers are also consumers and that their paychecks keep the economy going.

We can?t have a healthy economy until that bargain is restored.

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. This post originally ran on www.robertreich.org.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/G-Dof-IPM90/Restoring-the-basic-bargain-between-the-rich-and-the-rest

publishers clearing house scare tactics stacy keibler stacy keibler dancing with the stars season 13 cast tay sachs tay sachs

Police believe single killer behind Long Island bodies

By WNBC

Police on Long Island now believe a single serial killer may be responsible for the 10 bodies found along a deserted oceanside highway, shifting their theory away from multiple killers as they previously believed.

Police also don't believe the disappearance of Shannan Gilbert is connected to the killings.

Suffolk County Police Commissioner Richard Dormer told NBC New York?on?Tuesday that police now think a single person is behind the deaths of the human remains found on Gilgo Beach, most of them in the last year.

Most were young women, but one body was a child and another was a man.


"The common denominators that we have now indicate that it's possibly one killer," Dormer said in a phone interview. "We've had the same dumping ground, sex workers, young women -- even though there were the Asian male and the toddler -- but we think they were connected to the sex trade in some way. And these common denominators indicate we have the one person committing these crimes."

Newsday also reported that Dormer doesn't think the death of Gilbert, a sex worker who was seen frantically running from a house in Oak Beach early May 2010, is connected. Her body has not been found.

"We believe that it's just a coincidence that she went missing in Oak Beach and the bodies were found on Gilgo Beach, which is right across Ocean Parkway and farther west," he told Newsday. "The M.O. is completely different, the scenario is completely different."

But Dormer acknowledged the fear there will be new victims. "That's why we are moving as fast as we possibly can to apprehend this person," he told the paper.

In the interview with NBC New York, he added that another initial theory that the killer worked in law enforcement has been "debunked."

"It's not unusual for people to be very familiar with how police conduct investigations, and how criminals try to evade capture," Dormer said. "That came up early in the investigation, but it's not credible at this time."

10 bodies found
Between December 2010 and April of this year, the remains of eight women, a male and a female toddler were found dumped along a stretch of Ocean Parkway. Five of the women were identified and found to have been working prostitutes.

Among the remains still unidentified are the toddler and a woman believed to be her mother, and the man, also believed to be a sex worker.

Initially, police said there could be as many as three killers behind the bodies, all using the brush along the parkway as a dumping ground.

But, Dormer told NBC New York Tuesday, police now believe one killer is behind the dumped bodies, though even "that could change" as the investigation moves forward.

Detectives also believe the killer is from Long Island.

"The person has got to be comfortable with the locations," Dormer said, citing the long distances between Manorville and Gilgo Beach, and from Davis Park to Gilgo Beach. "That's the theory, that it's a Long Islander."

"That's a huge distance, so somebody has to be familiar with the Long Island area and comfortable with that area," Dormer said.

Dormer said the case remains "high priority," and that police are "still actively investigating this."

Source: http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/11/30/9115591-police-believe-single-serial-killer-behind-long-island-bodies

black friday walmart 2011 colt mccoy sams club dancing with the stars winner pecan pie recipe too short thanksgiving

Signs point to Pujols staying

Jeff Passan of Yahoo! spoke with an MLB executive who says?he?s ?100 percent certain? Albert Pujols will re-sign with the Cardinals. ?The reason: no one else is really showing interest. At least no one with the kind of money to outbid St. Louis.

I?ve kinda assumed this for a while. It was just bad timing for Pujols to hit the market, with with the Yankees and Red Sox both committing to top-notch first basemen in recent years. ?That left the occasional-spenders out there. Texas. Los Angeles. Detroit. Washington. Maybe the Cubs. Those teams either have a first baseman already or just don?t seem to want to pony up this year.

Albert is going to stay with the Cardinals. He?ll still be very rich. His legacy will be much better for it. And the Cardinals will be a much better team for it, at least for the next several years.

Source: http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/28/report-its-100-percent-certain-that-pujols-will-stay-with-the-cardinals/related/

lana peters jennifer nettles jennifer nettles giants vs saints suh suh school closings